Police Discipline


The Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA), the Police Department, and the Police Board have different roles. The responsibility to receive complaints of alleged misconduct by Chicago police officers rests with COPA.  Depending on the nature of the allegations, either COPA or the Police Department's Bureau of Internal Affairs will investigate the complaint.  The Board’s role is to decide those disciplinary matters that are filed with the Board.

For more information, watch this video in English or Spanish.

The Police Board's Role

The Police Board decides disciplinary matters involving allegations of serious misconduct made against members of the Chicago Police Department. The Board has the responsibility to:

  • Decide cases when the Superintendent of Police files charges to discharge a police officer from the Chicago Police Department; and
  • Rule on matters in which the Chief Administrator of the Civilian Office of Police Accountability and the Superintendent of Police do not agree regarding discipline of a police officer.

See Allegations of Police Misconduct: A Guide to the Complaint and Disciplinary Process and other Police Board publications for detailed information.

Police Board Decisions

Section 2-84-030 of the Municipal Code of Chicago requires the Police Board to post on this website its Findings and Decisions in disciplinary cases.  Below are the Findings and Decisions decided in:

Go to the Archives for the Findings and Decisions of cases decided in previous years.

Reports and Data on Police Board Cases

Cases Currently Before the Police Board

Currently before the Police Board are the following cases in which the Superintendent of Police has filed charges against a member of the Chicago Police Department (unless otherwise noted below, the Superintendent recommended that the member be discharged from the Chicago Police Department). A copy of the charges filed in a particular case is available by clicking on the case number below. (The public is reminded that the filing of charges is not evidence of guilt. The accused officer is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair hearing at which the Superintendent has the burden of proving guilt by a preponderance of the evidence.)

The hearings are open to the public. (Contact Police Board Executive Administrative Assistant Jazmyne Rollins at Jazmyne.Rollins@cityofchicago.org for information on changes to procedures due to the COVID-19 pandemic.) An evidentiary hearing resembles a trial in court, although not as formal; the typical case includes opening statements, witness testimony, and closing arguments. (The Board has entered a third Order on holding evidentiary hearings via Zoom.) Status hearings typically include the attorneys and the hearing officer addressing various issues in preparation for the evidentiary hearing. TUA = Taken under advisement (the evidentiary hearing is complete and a decision will be forthcoming).

Unless otherwise indicated, hearings are scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m.

Case Number:  Description of Primary Charges--Next Hearing Date

No. 20 PB 2982: Conducted illegal searches and made false reports--TUA

No. 21 PB 2990: Used deadly force without justification (charges against two officers)--August 29 (status hearing)

No. 21 PB 2991: Used deadly force without justification (charges against two officers)--September 27, 28, and 30 at 9:00am each day (evidentiary hearing)

No. 21 PB 2994: Used excessive force and failed to report misconduct (charges against four officers): TUA

No. 21 PB 2995: Used deadly force without justification--TUA

No. 21 PB 2998: Verbal abuse of an arrestee--TUA

No. 21 PB 2999: Resided outside the City of Chicago--TUA

No. 21 PB 3000: Misconduct during the execution of a search warrant in a residence--November 14 - 18 (evidentiary hearing)

No. 22 PB 3001: Used excessive force, failed to report misconduct, made false statements (charges against three officers)--October 17 - 20 (evidentiary hearing)

No. 22 PB 3002: Domestic incidents off duty and made a false statement--September 19 - 20 at 9:00am (evidentiary hearing)

No. 22 PB 3004: Neglect of duty and made false statements (charges against two officers): November 7, 8, and 10 (evidentiary hearing)

No. 22 PB 3005: Used excessive force and made false statements: January 11 - 13 (evidentiary hearing)

Rulings on COPA/CPD Disagreements on Discipline

When the Chief Administrator and the Superintendent of Police do not agree regarding discipline of a Department member, the Chief Administrator shall refer the matter to a member of the Police Board.

The reviewing member shall then rule on the disagreement between the Chief Administrator and the Superintendent, as follows:

  • If, in the opinion of the reviewing member, the Superintendent’s response did not meet the burden of overcoming the Chief Administrator’s recommendation for discipline, the recommendation shall be deemed to be accepted by the Superintendent.
  • If, in the opinion of the reviewing member, the Superintendent’s response met the burden of overcoming the Chief Administrator’s recommendation for discipline, the Superintendent's response shall be implemented.

The reviewing member must recuse her/himself from any future involvement with such case by the full Police Board.

This review process is set forth in Section 2-78-130 of the Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA) ordinance and in Article VI of the Police Board Rules of Procedure.

The rulings of reviewing members are posted below, as required by the COPA ordinance.

Go to the Archives for the decisions from previous years.

Department Main Office

Chicago Police Board

I Want To