Police Discipline

Overview

The Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA), the Police Department, and the Police Board have different roles. The responsibility to receive complaints of alleged misconduct by Chicago police officers rests with COPA.  Depending on the nature of the allegations, either COPA or the Police Department's Bureau of Internal Affairs will investigate the complaint.  The Board’s role is to decide those disciplinary matters that are filed with the Board.

For more information, watch this video in English or Spanish.

 

The Police Board's Role

The Police Board decides disciplinary matters involving allegations of serious misconduct made against members of the Chicago Police Department. The Board has the responsibility to:

  • Decide cases when the Superintendent of Police files charges to discharge or suspend a police officer for more than thirty days; and
  • Decide matters in which the Chief Administrator of the Civilian Office of Police Accountability and the Superintendent of Police do not agree regarding discipline of a police officer.

See Allegations of Police Misconduct: A Guide to the Complaint and Disciplinary Process and other Police Board publications for detailed information.

 

Reports and Data on Police Board Cases

Police Board Decisions

Section 2-84-030 of the Municipal Code of Chicago requires the Police Board to post on this website its Findings and Decisions in disciplinary cases.  Below are the Findings and Decisions decided in:

  • January 2021: None
  • February 2021: Case No. 21 PB 2985

Go to the Archives for the Findings and Decisions of cases decided in previous years.

 

Cases Currently Before the Police Board

Currently before the Police Board are the following cases in which the Superintendent of Police has filed charges against a member of the Chicago Police Department (unless otherwise noted below, the Superintendent recommended that the member be discharged from the Chicago Police Department). A copy of the charges filed in a particular case is available by clicking on the case number below. (The public is reminded that the filing of charges is not evidence of guilt. The accused officer is presumed innocent and is entitled to a fair hearing at which the Superintendent has the burden of proving guilt by a preponderance of the evidence.)

The hearings are open to the public. (Contact Police Board Executive Director Max Caproni at Max.Caproni@cityofchicago.org for information on changes to procedures due to the COVID-19 outbreak.) An evidentiary hearing resembles a trial in court, although not as formal; the typical case includes opening statements, witness testimony, and closing arguments. (The Board has entered a Order on holding evidentiary hearings via Zoom.) Status hearings typically include the attorneys and the hearing officer addressing various issues in preparation for the evidentiary hearing. TUA = Taken under advisement (the evidentiary hearing is complete and a decision will be forthcoming).

Unless otherwise indicated, hearings are scheduled to begin at 10:00 a.m. 

 

Case Number:  Description of Primary Charges--Next Hearing Date

No. 19 PB 2966: Charges related to the off-duty shooting of an individual--March 8 - 12 (evidentiary hearing) 

No. 20 PB 2971: Sexual misconduct while off duty and false statements--March 3 (status hearing) (evidentiary hearing postponed due to the COVID-19 outbreak)

No. 20 PB 2972: Used excessive force and made a false statement--TUA

No. 20 PB 2973: Medical-roll violations and false report--TUA

No. 20 PB 2974: Used deadly force without justification and made false statements (charges against two officers)--March 4 (status hearing via audio conference due to the COVID-19 outbreak)

No. 20 PB 2976: Domestic altercations (off duty)--April 14 - 16 (evidentiary hearing at 10:00am on the 14th and 9:30am on the 15th and 16th)

No. 20 PB 2977: Made false statements regarding a police-involved shooting--March 3 (status hearing via audio conference due to the COVID-19 outbreak), March 8 - 10 & 12 (evidentiary hearing)

No. 20 PB 2978: Charges stemming from a vehicle pursuit--April 28 - 30 (evidentiary hearing)

No. 20 PB 2979: De-certified as a law enforcement officer due to felony conviction--March 25 (status hearing via audio conference due to the COVID-19 outbreak) 

No. 20 PB 2980: Made a false report and engaged in an off-duty altercation--March 4 (status hearing via audio conference due to the COVID-19 outbreak)

No. 20 PB 2981: Sexual misconduct while off duty--Motion to w/d charges TUA (Respondent resigned from the CPD)   

No. 20 PB 2982: Conducted illegal searches and made false reports--March 19 (status hearing via audio conference due to the COVID-19 outbreak)

No. 21 PB 2983: Threatened arrestee and made false statements--March 19 (status hearing via audio conference due to the COVID-19 outbreak)

No. 21 PB 2984: Domestic altercation--March 4 (status hearing via audio conference due to the COVID-19 outbreak)

No. 21 PB 2986: Used deadly force without justification--March 24 (status hearing via audio conference due to the COVID-19 outbreak)

No. 21 PB 2987: Charges stemming from statements on social media--March 25 (status hearing via audio conference due to the COVID-19 outbreak)

 

Reviews of Disciplinary Recommendations Under the COPA Ordinance

When the Chief Administrator and the Superintendent of Police do not agree regarding discipline of a Department member, the Chief Administrator shall refer the matter to a member of the Police Board.

The reviewing member shall then resolve the disagreement between the Chief Administrator and the Superintendent, as follows:

  • If, in the opinion of the reviewing member, the Superintendent’s response did not meet the burden of overcoming the Chief Administrator’s recommendation for discipline, the recommendation shall be deemed to be accepted by the Superintendent.
  • If, in the opinion of the reviewing member, the Superintendent’s response met the burden of overcoming the Chief Administrator’s recommendation for discipline, the Superintendent's response shall be implemented.

The reviewing member must recuse her/himself from any future involvement with such case by the full Police Board.

This review process is set forth in Section 2-78-130 of the Civilian Office of Police Accountability (COPA) ordinance and in Article VI of the Police Board Rules of Procedure.

The decisions of reviewing members are posted below, as required by the COPA ordinance.

Go to the Archives for the decisions from previous years.

Department Main Office

Chicago Police Board
  • Phone: 312.742.4194
  • 2 North LaSalle Street
    Suite M800
    Chicago, IL 60602 (Business Hours 8:30 am to 4:30 pm Monday - Friday)   
    Get Directions

I Want To